When it comes to modern superhero cinema, the buzzword is
“realism”.
The problem is that “realism” has become one of the most
misunderstood concepts in the genre. Sometimes realism means stripping away the
fantasy elements and asking what a character like Batman or Superman would look
like if they existed in our world. Sometimes it means embracing a bleak
worldview where heroes are viewed with suspicion, idealism is treated as naïve,
and morality exists only within shades of gray. Other times, realism becomes a
form of self-aware irony, where the absurdity of superheroes themselves is
presented in >wink wink, nudge nudge< fashion. However one slices it, the
fact remains these interpretations of realism are simply different forms of
cynicism. They confuse darkness with depth.
A superhero story does not become mature because the hero
kills, because the world is miserable, or because the tone is relentlessly
bleak. Those things can create a certain atmosphere, but atmosphere is not
maturity.
True maturity comes from understanding consequences. It
comes from examining what happens in the aftermath of battle. It comes from
exploring grief, responsibility, sacrifice, relationships, and the emotional
cost of being a hero. That is the difference between realism and
verisimilitude. The greatest fantasy stories are not realistic because they
remove the extraordinary. They are realistic because they make the extraordinary
emotionally believable. This was something Richard Donner understood when he
made Superman (1978). Donner did not make Superman compelling by diminishing
him. He made him compelling by honoring the spirit of the material. And it
wasn’t an isolated situation. Captain America: The Winter Soldier (2014)
demonstrated that a comic book film could explore political complexity and
moral uncertainty while still respecting the heroic ideals at its center. But
too often, modern superhero cinema has mistaken grimness for adulthood.
Which is why Spider-Man: Brand New Day is such a refreshing
surprise.
Because despite being a story about impossible abilities,
advanced technology, and costumed heroes, it may be one of the most genuinely
adult comic book films in years for a fairly simple reason: It remembers that
this is a “Spider-Man” story.
Does Whatever The Spider Can.
One of Marvel Comics’ greatest innovations was combining two genres that had previously existed separately: superhero adventure and personal drama (i.e. soap opera/romance). By the late 1950s and early 1960s, superhero comics had lost much of their previous dominance, while romance and soap opera comics had developed their own audiences. Marvel’s revolutionary approach was to merge these styles, creating stories where the personal struggles of the characters were just as important as the battles they fought. Spider-Man became the ultimate expression of that philosophy.
Peter Parker was never compelling simply because he could
defeat villains. He was compelling because underneath the mask was a person
dealing with loneliness, responsibility, insecurity, relationships, and the
consequences of his own choices. That is why Brand New Day feels like perhaps
the closest cinematic representation of Spider-Man’s comic book roots.
The story takes place years after Peter Parker’s (Tom
Holland) devastating decision in Spider-Man: No Way Home (2021), where the entire
world forgets that Peter Parker exists. Everyone remembers Spider-Man, but no
one remembers the person beneath the mask. Since then, he’s completely embraced
his alter ego, dedicating himself solely to fighting crime complete with his
own “Commissioner Gordon” in the form of Detective Jean DeWolff (Liza
Colon-Zayas) and new AI assistant, E.V. (Naomi Watts). This creates a fascinating
inversion of Spider-Man 2, where Tobey Maguire’s Parker attempts to escape the
burden of being Spider-Man. Here, Holland’s Parker does the opposite. In the
meantime, both MJ (Zendaya) and Ned (Jacob Batalon) have moved on with their
lives without knowing he exists. On the flip side, Spider-Man is revered as a
hero. So the tragedy is no longer that the world hates Spider-Man, but that the
world has forgotten Peter Parker. That loss is immeasurable. It is the
experience of losing something one cannot replace — a relationship, a version
of oneself, a chapter of ones life — while the rest of the world continues
moving forward.
The Spider v. The Man.
At first glance, Brand New Day appears to follow a traditional superhero formula. Peter becomes involved with Frank Castle (Jon Bernthal), better known as “The Punisher”, as they investigate a mystery involving Damage Control, the organization responsible for handling the aftermath of conflicts involving enhanced individuals. But director Destin Daniel Cretton, working from a screenplay by Chris McKenna and Erik Sommers, uses that premise as a foundation for something much deeper. The superhero elements are almost secondary but the core conflicts are emotional. The film explores themes of grief, trauma, acceptance, and learning how to move forward. This is where this film separates itself from many other interpretations of “realistic” superhero storytelling. It does not present trauma as an excuse for cynicism. It presents trauma as something human beings must confront.
Every major character is carrying some form of damage. Peter
is isolated from the people who once defined his life. Frank continues to live
with the loss of his family, allowing his pain to become his purpose. MJ and
Ned feel like a part of them is missing, even if they cannot articulate it. The
characters are not simply fighting external enemies, but parts of themselves
shaped by loss. In fact, it lends believability to the Spider-Man/Punisher
dynamic. They are mirror images of the other; cautionary tales. That is why the
relationship between Spider-Man and the Punisher works so well. They represent
two different responses to tragedy. Frank is consumed by grief while
Parker is still searching for a reason
to hope despite overwhelmingly palpable, deep sadness. The film understands that moving
forward does not mean forgetting what happened. It means accepting that life
continues even when parts of it are gone.
The Performances and Score Make the Emotional Weight Work
One of the smartest choices made by the production was allowing time to pass between installments and allowing the actors to naturally age into these roles. The characters feel older because the performers themselves have lived with them.
Tom Holland has completely claimed the character of Peter
Parker/Spider-Man as his own, and it’s a testament to his acting that he’s
developed a remarkable ability to communicate emotion while completely hidden
behind Spider-Man’s mask. Through movement, posture, and physical expression
alone, Holland conveys exhaustion, sadness, determination, and hope. It is the
work of a performer who understands that Spider-Man’s humanity exists even when
Peter Parker’s face cannot be seen.
John Bernthal has spent years portraying Frank Castle,
bringing a brutal intensity and wounded humanity to the character. The
challenge was whether that gritty “R” version of the Punisher could exist in a
“PG” Spider-Man story. The answer is a resounding “yes”. The essence of Frank
Castle remains intact — the anger, the pain, and the uncompromising pursuit of
justice — but Peter Parker’s influence creates the possibility of change. In
many ways, this is as much Frank Castle’s story as it is Peter Parker’s. The
chemistry between Holland and Bernthal gives their scenes a natural emotional
rhythm, allowing their differences to become the foundation of their
connection.
Zendaya’s MJ and Batalon’s Ned also continue to provide the
emotional foundation that has defined this era of Spider-Man films. The three have
such a natural chemistry that it helps to underscore the tragic nature of their
current reality. It’s familiar, but oh so different.
As of the time of this writing (late, for which I apologize)
Sadie Sink’s role in the film is no secret. However, I will not spoil that
here. Nevertheless, her character epitomizes the films themes and anchors it in
brutal truth. She brings a powerful presence and serves as an effective
counterpoint to Peter’s journey.
Every relationship in the film reflects another. Every
character forces another to confront something they would rather avoid.
Even Michael Giacchino’s score reflects those themes in a
compelling score that is familiar and in turns rousing and somber. It reflects
the transformative nature of the characters both internally (in one respect
more than any other) and amongst themselves.
A Brand New Beginning.
Ultimately, Spider-Man: Brand New Day is a story about endings and beginnings. It understands that life does not always provide closure. People leave. Relationships change. People change. Sometimes the person you were can never fully return. But that does not mean the future has no value.
The film refuses to wrap everything in a perfect bow. It
allows uncertainty to exist (as is necessary for the inevitable films to close
out this new trilogy). The Parker luck remains. But there is also a sense of
possibility.
In a cinematic landscape filled with cynical heroes, grim
interpretations, and endless ironic commentary, Spider-Man: Brand New Day feels
refreshing because it believes in something. That heroism still matters. That
compassion is not weakness. That hope can exist alongside pain.
The film gives this incarnation of Spider-Man a new coat of
paint without simply repeating what came before. It allows these characters to
evolve while preserving the qualities that made audiences care about them in
the first place.
After years of Spider-Man stories, this does not feel like a
return. It feels more like a...homecoming.
A brand new day, indeed.
Great review, thank you!
ReplyDelete